“Og-blog” stands for “open-government blog” and that’s what we do: tell people about open-government issues of interest to regular citizens, media, trade associations, and government agencies. We find interesting stories and court cases from Washington State and other places about the Public Records Act, Open Public Meetings Act, access-to-court rulings, and media law.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Public Records Show ... L&I Lied to Legislature on Workers Comp Rate Increase
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
"Taking your government for a stroll in the dark"
Friday, October 22, 2010
Obama Given Low Marks for Transparency
Thursday, October 21, 2010
County Wants to Discuss Union Salaries in Private
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Whatcom County Calls Special Meeting to Look at Its Public Records Compliance
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
EFF to Appeal Ruling Denying Access to Ferry Worker Drug Testing Records
Many Candidates Silent on Open Gov't Issues
Open government is one of the most popular political issues according to poll after poll. Why aren't candidates taking the opportunity to explain to voters that they are pro-open government? Could it be that local elected officials like county commissioners and city council members generally don't like open government and their endorsements of a candidate are more important to that candidate than being pro-open government?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Oregon Attorney General Works on Open Gov't Issues
Friday, October 8, 2010
! Supreme Court Rules Metadata a "Public Record" !
- Metadata in an email or other electronic document is a "public record" subject to disclosure.
- A print-out of the email is not sufficient if metadata is requested.
- An agency may not delete emails that have been requested; the electronic version of the email must be preserved and provided.
It was a 5-4 decision. The justices ruling in favor of disclosure were: Owens, Fairhurst, Sanders, Stephens, and Chambers.
A dissent argued that the agency examining an agency employee's home computer for public records is potentially an unlawful "search." The dissenting justices were: Alexander, Chief Justice Madsen, C. Johnson, and J. Johnson.
The Attorney General filed a "friend of the court" brief arguing against disclosure.
UPDATE: Here is an AP story about the case. Here is a blog piece by Bruce Ramsey and Lynne Varner of the Seattle Times.
NOTE: Michele Earl-Hubbard, David Norman, and Chris Roslaniec of Allied Law Group represented the public records requestors.
Bell, CA City Manager May Sue for Back Pay!
Note that the purported decision to provide the city manager severance pay was made in a closed executive session. Of course. You wouldn't want people to see what was going on.
Thanks to Bill for this story.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Public Records Show ... Recalled Kids' Glasses Toxic
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Editorial on How Bell, CA Scandal Shows Need for Public Records Laws
Open Meetings Act Violates Politicians' Free Speech Rights?
Apparently the professor advocates government's constitutional right to rule people in secret.