The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case on whether public employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the use of publicy-financed communication devices, in this case texting.
Thanks to Rusty for sending this to us.
“Og-blog” stands for “open-government blog” and that’s what we do: tell people about open-government issues of interest to regular citizens, media, trade associations, and government agencies. We find interesting stories and court cases from Washington State and other places about the Public Records Act, Open Public Meetings Act, access-to-court rulings, and media law.
We warmly welcome your thoughts on og-blog and especially welcome your emails with suggested postings and links to interesting stories and court cases. If you have something to say about open government in Washington State, sending it to og-blog is probably the best way to get it out. Don’t hesitate to contact us at greg@overstreet-law.com.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(263)
-
▼
December
(14)
- Bill Proposed to Create "Office of Open Records"
- Public Records Show ... State Officials Nervous Ab...
- "If you sign a petition, it should be public record"
- The (Longview) Daily News Editorial on Pres. Obama...
- The Fight for WaMu Documents
- US Supreme Court to Review Public Employee Privacy
- Spokesman-Review Editorial on U.S. Supreme Court C...
- An Elected Official Gets It
- Oregon Jumps on Open Gov't Ombudsman Bandwagon
- "Federal workshop on openness closed to the public"
- Jefferson County Violating First Amendment?
- Op-Ed in Port Townsend Leader on Open Gov't
- Columbian Column on Public Records Administrative ...
- Op-Ed Blasts Whatcom Ruling on Destroying Records
-
▼
December
(14)